Agreed. I also personally think loop is more logical, anyway. Continue implies that the loop will actually stop until an explicit continue statement, IMO. Less keywords is good too. On 27 Apr 2013 18:24, "Diggory Hardy" <[email protected]> wrote:
> What the... > > There's better things to innovate on than renaming 'continue'. Sometimes I > think rules get taken too far. Perhaps the fact this has been such a long- > running argument is evidence of a problem. > > On Friday 26 April 2013 10:16:15 Graydon Hoare wrote: > > On 26/04/2013 8:24 AM, Felix S. Klock II wrote: > > > (Felix-Hulk would appreciate it if further discussion on this fork of > > > the thread had a subject line that reflected its content.) > > > > Tech-lead-graydon asks that we _not_ revisit 'loop', on this thread or > > any other. We've been over it so many times that it makes me cry just to > > see it on the list. It's been dormant for almost a year. Let it remain > > dormant. I'd rather the language be proven LL(7) than entertain another > > conversation about it. > > > > I will offer instead, as distraction, a short video about loops: > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QER_yqTcmjM > > > > You can also re-read issue 2229 if you want to fall into a hall of > > mirrors for a while and argue yourself into exhaustion: > > > > https://github.com/mozilla/rust/issues/2229 > > > > -Graydon > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Rust-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev > _______________________________________________ > Rust-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev >
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
