On 13-04-25 08:40 AM, John Clements wrote: > Well, that's the question. Currently the grammar (and compiler) allow > this. I'd like to define a grammar here that nails down what's allowed a > little more tightly, rather than deferring entirely to (currently > broken) constant evaluation.
Yes. Formalizing and completing the definition of the constant expression subgrammar would be extremely valuable. It's one of the major high-risk areas remaining the the design space. -Graydon _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
