On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 3:21 PM, SiegeLord <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't know how I feel about the struct definition. I feel like it should
> be replaced with a list of public fields (in order, so you can use the
> documentation to instantiate a struct manually). Alternatively it could
> stay, but each field could link to an documentation entry for that field.
>

Good point. It probably should only include the "raw" definition in a
collapsed box, only the field list, hyperlinked and doc'd, would be
included.

> This also brings a point of public vs private API, it'd be nice if the doc
> generator could generate a public-only API documentation and a public +
> private API documentation.
>

Definitely.
_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev

Reply via email to