Oops, accidentally sent that twice. Anyway, I just realised that the
timestamp for editing is only accurate to a minute (from what I can see),
so someone could easily write a script that automatically edits any
comments by a reviewer (or just sticks by their emails and quickly edits
it). So disregard my last idea.


On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Graydon Hoare <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Some clever folks on #rust have pointed out that there is a (somewhat)
> exploitable security flaw in the way bors consumes r+ comments.
> Specifically, github permits a repository owner, in some circumstances
> (which we can't quite figure out) to _edit comments of other people_ on
> commits in their repository.
>
> This means that the following attack scenario would work:
>
>
>   DrEvil: Files a PR
>   Reviewer: Comments "this is awful!" on PR head-commit
>   DrEvil: Edits comment to "r+ p=100" and lands change
>
> So, to work around this I'll probably teach bors to require review
> comments in a different fashion, such as "r+ <sha1>" on the PR itself, or
> similar. In the meantime, reviewers beware: anything you say on the
> head-commit of a PR can be rewritten by the submitter into an r+, so assume
> that "commenting _at all_ implies approval".
>
> -Graydon
> ______________________________**_________________
> Rust-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.mozilla.org/**listinfo/rust-dev<https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev>
>
_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev

Reply via email to