On 12.08.2013 23:58, Graydon Hoare wrote: > On 13-08-12 02:06 PM, Daniel Micay wrote: > >> I don't think it makes sense to switch from pandoc. It's more >> featureful than the other generators, and has many supported output >> formats. The perceived popularity is much less important than >> quantifiable differences between the alternatives. > > Yeah, I'd prefer we don't change the doc format on a whim. > > Most pandoc-supported extensions are either common across markdown > implementations or not-used in rust docs. If you find particularly > troubling ones we can evaluate them / remove them on a case by case > basis. Which ones are you running into?
Valid points. I'd just rather not have to defer to an external process for every small piece of markdown we render during the build. But let's see if there is anything critical that is not supported by the lib I'm using now, and if so I'll add a pandoc renderer. I still don't know *what* is problematic at the moment though. Anyway this can be adjusted later. It's not really a show-stopper right now if a couple docblocks appear funny I think? Cheers -- Jordi Boggiano @seldaek - http://nelm.io/jordi _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
