On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 03:15:47PM +0000, Bill Myers wrote:
> BTW, how about keeping it, and calling it "&volatile" instead of
> "&const", since that's what C uses to name something that can be
> changed outside the program's control?

That's the best proposed name I've seen. One problem might be that it
has a known meaning to C programmers which is distinct (but
overlapping) from the meaning in Rust...



Niko
_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev

Reply via email to