On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 6:52 AM, Niko Matsakis <[email protected]> wrote: > > I stand by the arguments I made in that post. My experience at least > has been that implicit moves have been much more pleasant to work with > than explicit ones, and the language is simpler as well.
I agree, and I think this is one of the most compelling features of the language. The lack of implicit heap allocations is a great example of Rust being more suited to systems programming than C++. It's also nice to have the guarantee that every type can be moved or swapped, since it leads to being able to write very flexible move-only containers. _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
