Such sugar would would use some sort of monad trait right? On Sunday, December 8, 2013, Ziad Hatahet wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Gábor Lehel > <[email protected]<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', '[email protected]');> > > wrote: > >> I do wonder whether it wouldn't make sense to add sugar for Option, at >> least eventually. (`int?` at the type level is really nice, too... too bad >> it doesn't play so well with Rust's sigils. Introducing the potential >> confusion between `~?T` and `?~T` is probably a step too far.) >> > > Wouldn't it be better to add something similar to Haskell's `do` instead > of another sigil? > > > -- > Ziad > >
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
