I m interessed on having your feedback on json and yaml vs toml for instance. Le 4 janv. 2014 19:28, "Paul Nathan" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> On 1/4/14 10:00 AM, Michael Neumann wrote: > > > > Am 04.01.2014 18:38, schrieb Corey Richardson: > >> oslo.config looks decent. On some projects I've worked on, we started > >> out using INI files but found them severely lacking once we wanted to > >> extend the options. We ended up using libconfig[0], which I think is > >> an excellent library. In multibuilder[1], we use extra::serialize to > >> load a config directly into the struct we'll be using. It's super > >> convenient, but a bit unfortunate in that it's impossible to make a > >> field truly optional (Option<T> requires the field to be null, iirc). > >> > >> [0] http://www.hyperrealm.com/libconfig/ > >> [1] https://github.com/huonw/multibuilder/blob/master/main.rs#L68 > > > > There is also TOML [1], an extended version of the INI config file > format, > > which is used by a variety of languages. > > > > [1]: https://github.com/mojombo/toml > > > > Regards, > > > > Michael > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Rust-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev > > . > > > > I've used YAML, JSON, and INI extensively for configuration, and I > confess that each have their problems. > > I agree that TOML is an excellent idea (I wrote the Common Lisp TOML > parser). I just don't know off-hand how widely its been picked up in > the past year. > > -- > Regards, > Paul > > > _______________________________________________ > Rust-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
