I think I touched one of the installation instruction pages at one point. Either way, all my edits are in the public domain or in whatever license Mozilla requests.
--Andrew D On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Thad Guidry <[email protected]> wrote: > I touched the wiki. All "Thad Guidry" edits are Public Domain, of course. > Or MIT/ASL2 license if you so desire. > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Brian Anderson <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hey. >> >> Time for more legal stuff. Per https://github.com/mozilla/ >> rust/issues/5831 the licensing of our documentation is not clear. Like >> all things Rust we want to make our doc license as permissive as possible, >> so after getting some legal advice here is what I intend to do: >> >> * Rust documentation will be MIT/ASL2 licensed like everything else. >> * Add the license as a *footer* to existing in-tree documentation, under >> the argument that it is already licensed according to the same terms as the >> rest of the repo. >> * Gather new statements from wiki contributors asserting that they >> contrtibuted under the MIT/ASL2, as we did when we relicensed Rust. >> * Put the license as footers on all pages of the wiki. >> >> For the most part this should not affect anybody, though if you've ever >> touched the wiki you may recieve an email from me about this in the future. >> >> Regards, >> Brian >> _______________________________________________ >> Rust-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev >> > > > > -- > -Thad > +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry> > Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/> > > _______________________________________________ > Rust-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
