I've opened an issue on the naming problem
https://github.com/mozilla/rust/issues/11765
On 01/23/2014 08:55 PM, Benjamin Striegel wrote:
If we're going to quibble over names we might as well call the types
Sender and Receiver.
Really though, EVERYONE is fine with the proposed semantics from the
original thread? Really? Speak up if you have anything valuable to add
that isn't bikeshedding! :)
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:13 PM, don <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi, as a not contributing listen-in,
i would like to voice that source and sink share the same initial
and therefore source and drain might be more useful.
I hope i didn't offend by voicing my opinion,
keep up the good work!
Regards Don
Am 24.01.2014 04:54, schrieb Brandon Sanderson:
I would expect Channel::new() to create a channel object that
either
lets me send and receive, or lets me get a source and sink to
send and
receive with. Borrow rules may prevent this, but my point is that
Channel::new() would generally be expected to return a struct,
and not a
tuple.
On Jan 23, 2014 7:29 PM, "Benjamin Striegel"
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
This all seems a bit silly. A channel *is*, conceptually,
a tuple of
a sender and a receiver. If I call Chan::new(), that's
what I expect
to get. And Chan::open() doesn't map to anything that's as
intuitive.
Is naming really all that's left to argue about? How does
everyone
feel about the semantics of the proposal?
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:20 PM, Strahinja Markovic
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
On Thu Jan 23 2014 at 7:18:11 PM, Tony Arcieri
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
I have a crazy idea...
Channel::open()
That's a better name for the function, agreed.
https://lh3.ggpht.com/-WpuYGqCEHDg/UBznzaqReKI/AAAAAAAAB_0/0Vc8_mnnhqw/s1600/mind-blown.gif
--
Tony Arcieri
_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
