On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:28 AM, Lee Braiden <[email protected]> wrote: > > Finally (and this is more curiosity than suggestion, because it could make > the language too dynamic/magic), I wonder what's involved in dropping the > "...deriving..." syntax altogether, and automatically deriving functionality > for types that implement all the necessary underlying features? It seems > like that's what's done for types that fit POD, for example.
This would be incorrect in many cases. Then you're going to need a syntax to disable it, and you're *still* going to need the syntax to derive for non-Pod. _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
