On 2014-05-16, at 7:35, Steven Fackler <[email protected]> wrote: > Type annotations are not there for the compiler; they're there for people > reading the code. If I want to use some function I don't want to be forced to > read the entire implementation to figure out what the lifetime of the return > value is.
Just to be sure... I take it you are in fact implying that "yes, it is possible for the compiler to figure out those lifetimes without the programmer explicitly specifying them in the function signature"? _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
