On 19/06/14 03:05 AM, Jerry Morrison wrote: > > BigUint is weird: It can underflow but not overflow. When you use its > value in a more bounded way you'll need to bounds-check it then, whether > it can go negative or not. Wouldn't it be easier to discard it than > squeeze it into the wraparound or checked models?
I don't think we should have a big unsigned integer. It's not something I've seen other big integer libraries do.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
