On 25/07/14 09:21, Tommy M. McGuire wrote:
On 07/24/2014 05:55 PM, Huon Wilson wrote:
1.0 will not stabilise every function in every library; we have precise
stability attributes[1] so that the compiler can warn or error if you
are using functionality that is subject to change. The goal is to have
the entirety of the standard library classified and marked appropriately
for 1.0.
[1]: http://doc.rust-lang.org/master/rust.html#stability
How would that solve the general problem? What would the stability of
pow() be if Gregor had not brought up the issue now?
I was just pointing out that we aren't required to solve any/every
library issue before 1.0 (since the text I was quoting was rightfully
concerned about backwards incompatible API changes), not that this isn't
an issue.
Huon
_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
Rust-dev@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
