Oh well. I ended up using conrod (https://github.com/PistonDevelopers/conrod) for this, primarily because I need access to the underlying data model for the text. ᐧ
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Gaetan <gae...@xeberon.net> wrote: > To my opinion qt is far better, more portable, more easy to work with, but > binding qt on rust is quite a challenge. > > I think binding gtk3 is much easier, however I don't think there is any > project ready for production yet. > > > Le mardi 25 novembre 2014, Prasoon Shukla <prasoon92.i...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > > Hey all >> >> I have been thinking of making a small text editor, with emacs-like >> fundamentals, as a way learning rust this winter break. I need a GUI >> toolkit for this, of course. So, I searched for it and found this page: >> https://github.com/kud1ing/awesome-rust >> >> This page gives a few choices to me and since everything is alpha right >> now (both the language and the toolkits), I don't know which one to choose. >> As a reference, I have used GTK+ before and so, I could probably use it >> again <https://github.com/JeremyLetang/rgtk>. However, my primary >> concern is that the toolkit I use would stop active development - I don't >> want to have to port everything to another toolkit later on. So, if any >> project shows promise of continuing, please suggest it to me. >> >> Thank you. >> ᐧ >> > > > -- > ----- > Gaetan > > >
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
