On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 07:50:42AM +0300, Dan Muresan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It's pointless - you can just chdir in your code for the same effect.
>
> Except that with a --cwd option there would be no need for code at all,
So? The whole point of that --cwd option would be to make your *code*
work, is your memory that short? Nothing in urxvt needs this --cwd option.
> I could just add that to .fluxbox/menu. Ever put yourself in a user's
> shoes?
You are trolling, see above...
>> Nice out of context quoting - the documentation says "similar to", not "as
>> if you had started it with system".
>
> Didn't mean to, but I don't see how that makes a difference.
The difference is that your argument no longer applies.
> I'm not sure what you mean; the API documentation seems uneven (some
> parts are very well documented, others have holes).
So send patches if you know better...
>> If you think that as "current environment", why is it so hard to use it?
>
> I found it after digging for a while. I wish I didn't have to dig.
Being able to read sourcecode is certainly a basic quality - it's not as
if this function wasn't used internally, so there are ample examples of
it's use.
> guess that, just like people, some pieces of software are friendly and
> others are not.
You are again trolling. Please stop that - I am much more open to
non-bullshitting arguments that are based on facts. I am not open to
listening to stupid rhethorics such as "ever put yourself in your user's
shoes..." when it's obvious that the only "user" you are talking about
is you alone. Don't push your agenda on others and you will see that
everything is friendly.
--
The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
-----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net
----==-- _ generation
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
_______________________________________________
rxvt-unicode mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rxvt-unicode
