On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 03:04:55PM +0200, Milos Jakubicek <[email protected]>
wrote:
>> could you try and see if current CVS still needs any patches?
>>
>
> Yes -- of course it needs.
I don't understand the "of course" as quite some effort went into current
CVS because of that. Anyways, can you send me the compile log so I can see
whats still missing?
> This is no gcc/glibc bug, this is a (long) planned change in the
> behaviour of all glibc functions that take "const char*" and previously
> returned "char *". Now they return "const char*" and casting from "const
> char*" to "char*" must be done explicitly, if needed.
Uhm, yes?
--
The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
-----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net
----==-- _ generation
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [email protected]
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
_______________________________________________
rxvt-unicode mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rxvt-unicode
