On 26 April 2011 11:01, Marc Lehmann wrote: >> However, there's a discrepancy between implementation and >> documentation regarding the 'code' field of the sequence. > > It is kind of documented correctly, as it says code is like in the other > sequence, just decimal, but the example is clearly wrong. > > I improved the documentation to make it clear that the 32 is there, and in > the meantime, you can rely on the fact that the sequence is the same in > current and in future versions. > > Although we shortly thought about adding a few more parameters for the raw > mouse button, modifier mask and click number or so, the main driving force > behind designing the sequence was to make it easy for existing programs to > use it, which might explain the re-use of this weird encoding.
Thanks for the clarification. Andy _______________________________________________ rxvt-unicode mailing list [email protected] http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rxvt-unicode
