On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 05:48:25AM -0500, Kevin Thompson <[email protected]> 
wrote:
> With more and more users disabling their PC Speaker and rendering the
> system bell useless, should rxvt-unicode call on xkbbell instead? If
> no third party application is listening, I believe xkbbell still
> calls the system bell, but can be customized via xbelld or xkbevd.

If that is the case, I think the right way to proceed would be to teach
X iself about this, instead of patching every application to use such a
fragile mechanism.

> Furthermore, the more I'm looking, the more I believe xkbbell is
> shipped with any X.org system

Well, what's an X.org system? :)

> Thoughts? Opinions? Am I crazy?

No, you are trying to save a problem, but you only solve a tiny part of
the problem. Lots of apps use the bell, and would need patching too. It's
much better to patch the X-server instead. That would have the advantage
of working with remote displays as well.

-- 
                The choice of a       Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
      -----==-     _GNU_              http://www.deliantra.net
      ----==-- _       generation
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __      Marc Lehmann
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /      [email protected]
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\

_______________________________________________
rxvt-unicode mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rxvt-unicode
  • xkbbell? Kevin Thompson
    • Re: xkbbell? Marc Lehmann

Reply via email to