* Marc Lehmann <[email protected]> [31/12/12 12:59]:
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 12:26:56PM +0200, Moshe Kamensky 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Thank you. I'm still confused, though; urxvt does know, in some sense, 
> > that this is one character, rather than 6.
> 
> No: <1111> is six characters: "<", followed by four "1" characters, followed
> by a ">".
> 
> These six characters are not the same as the unicode character with code
> value 0x1111, which, in an utf-8 locale, would be represented by the three
> octets e1 84 91.
> 
> There is a difference between the two - urxvt simply displays what it
> receives.
> 
> > For example, when I access the line from a perl extension, using ROW_t,
> > I get just one character.
> 
> Sorry, but that's not true.
> 

You are right, I was just assuming it worked like that because the bidi 
worked correctly. Now I realise it was probably because of the 'a' in 
<202a>.

Thank you,
Moshe


_______________________________________________
rxvt-unicode mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rxvt-unicode

Reply via email to