On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 01:40:24PM -0200, Tiago Resende wrote: > On Wednesday, 2013-01-30, at 14:31:04 +0200, Emanuele Giaquinta wrote: > > > > Thanks for the report and the analysis. With which font does the problem > > occur? It seems suspicious to me is that two renditions belonging to the > > same wide char are different, but I am not sure if it is a bug. > > Sorry, I didn't think to mention the font since I had tested different > ones and got the same result, so I assumed it was happening regardless > of the font used. > > The one in the previous screenshot, is Nanum Gothic, specified with: > > urxvt -fn 'xft:Anonymous Pro-13,xft:NanumGothic-11' > > It can be found here: > > http://cdn.naver.com/naver/NanumFont/fontfiles/NanumFont_TTF_ALL.zip
Thanks. It should be fixed in cvs. Emanuele _______________________________________________ rxvt-unicode mailing list [email protected] http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rxvt-unicode
