Hi, On 10.12.2013 22:55, Marc Lehmann wrote: > Nevertheless, the code in urxvt is unconditional. I peeked a bit a the source and from what I understand there's actually no default icon (did this change in the development version? I'm looking at 9.19).
Pixbuf (--enable-pixbuf) is necessary for loading icons. Frills (--enable-frills) is necessary for certain EWMH properties (amongst others _NET_WM_ICON) There also seems to be no icon in the sources (like a ppm or so). > a) run something that deletes the property I've tried in Xephyr and move my .Xresources out of the way. That's as plain as I can think of. > b) run the same urxvt binary I've tried the one from my distribution (9.19), one with --enable-pixbuf (9.19) and one with --enable-frills (9.19). > c) really specify an icon file, and it is readable and not corrupt > (relative paths for example). So, just to be clear about this. Is there actually a default icon in vanilla urxvt? >> Can you see something suspicious which might be the reason for what I'm >> observing? > > My _guess_ is that it is a user error and you don't specify an icon file > (because in addition to running openbox, you also load .Xresources for > example). It's always a user error, it's only machines who make no mistakes. :) From my understanding right now, urxvt does not set a default icon by itself. Openbox then sets a default application icon, which pretty much looks like this [1], which is the first search result, when asking Google for "default application icon". So it looks like I (wrongly) assumed that urxvt sets a _NET_WM_ICON by itself, which it doesn't. In addition I got fooled by Openbox. Am I right with this? Wishes, Jochen [1] https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6c/Application-default-icon.svg/120px-Application-default-icon.svg.png
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ rxvt-unicode mailing list [email protected] http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rxvt-unicode
