On 04/06/14 at 16:25, Marc Lehmann wrote: > On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 02:02:36PM +0200, Andreas Herz <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I already played around with some configure options (like unicode3) and > > with several .Xdefaults settings, but even an empty file still results > > in the wrong font (just a square, looks like [] but even smaller). > > That's not the wrong font, that's a missing font. None of the fonts you > specified or that urxvt would fall back on contains a suitable glyph.
That's correct, after some search i found several others have the same issue. But now there is the explanation, thanks. > > I also switched fonts from terminus, proggyfont, profont, gohufont to > > even non bitmap fonts like dejavu ones. > > Most likely, those fonts don't contain this character, or were too big to > fit into your basefont. > > The only font on my system that I could find that contains that character > is code2000 (which is my fallback font for this reason). Hmm code2000 has some strange license and besides archlinux couldn't find it in the repos of my distris. But since it's working with st and xfce4-terminal i guess there must be some other font i already have installed to render this character. Is there a tool or some other fast/easy way to determine which font st/xfce4-terminal is using in this case? Or is there even some other way that those two terminal emulator use. > > Since i really love urxvt i would like to solve this issue, does anyone > > have an idea how to fix it? > > Add a font to your fontlist that contains that codepoint. Can i mix bitmap fonts with xft fonts? thanks so far! -- Andreas Herz _______________________________________________ rxvt-unicode mailing list [email protected] http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rxvt-unicode
