On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 09:08:53AM +0000, [email protected] wrote: > all im saying about xterm et al is that those terminal emulators dont erase > lines when you resize, and urxvt does.
"All I'm saying" is still not a license to repeat the same false statement while ignoring what you have been told: As I pointed out, xterm does erase, even if it does so slightly differently than urxvt. The difference, again, is that you have no choice over this erasing with xterm (afaik), while you have the choice with urxvt. > i personally find the behaviour surprising and undesirable, and find it > hard to accept it is by design (but i believe you now). also, i somehow > missed your workaround. could you tell me again? In short: printf '\e[99999;H\n\e[H' do that before running whatever you want to run, and it will reflow on resize. > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 02:24:01PM -0500, Elliot Wolk <[email protected]> > wrote: > > this is indeed a bug. Why did you quote all this without refering to it? This is not helpful. -- The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG -----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net ----==-- _ generation ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [email protected] -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ _______________________________________________ rxvt-unicode mailing list [email protected] http://lists.schmorp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rxvt-unicode
