On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 04:01:50PM -0600, Joe Peterson <[email protected]>
wrote:
> I've looked a little (but not enough yet) at the code where these two
> cases are handled, and I did wonder once or twice: is there a reason
> the case with no scrollback has to behave differently, or was the
> re-wrap code just never adapted to handle that case? If I have more
> time, I'll take another look at the code, especially if it's the
> latter.
Re-wrapping isn't something terminals traditionally do (probably only urxvt
does it), and it interferes with many "full-screen" applications. The reason
it's not done without scrollback is to make these apps work.
--
The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
-----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net
----==-- _ generation
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [email protected]
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
_______________________________________________
rxvt-unicode mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.schmorp.de/mailman/listinfo/rxvt-unicode
