On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 02:29:00AM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote: > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 11:52:16PM +0100, Marcin Szewczyk <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Now I can start urxvt like that: > > urxvt -pe "default,tabbed<app1|app2|app3>" > > I think ultimately, resources would be even better, especially for this kind > of use, as parsing and escaping will become prohibitively complicated. > > e.g. > > URxvt.tabbed.command.1: xxx > URxvt.tabbed.command.2: xxx
But wouldn't it mean that every urxvt started with tabbed extension enabled would have the same set of applications in tabs? Maybe syntax like the following one would be acceptable? URxvt.tabbed.command.group1.1: xxx URxvt.tabbed.command.group1.2: xxx URxvt.tabbed.command.group2.1: xxx URxvt.tabbed.command.group2.2: xxx Then one would start urxvt like so: urxvt -pe tabbed<group1> or urxvt -pe tabbed<group2> or urxvt -pe tabbed (to have one default tab at startup) What do you think? -- Marcin Szewczyk http://wodny.org _______________________________________________ rxvt-unicode mailing list [email protected] http://lists.schmorp.de/mailman/listinfo/rxvt-unicode
