On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:06:41PM +0300, Антон Кочков
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Can you please elaborate, what details are exactly wrong? Since I'm
> constantly updating this gist and will be
> happy to fix any inconsistencies or errors.
First of all, rxvt-unicode is an 88 colour terminal by default, a case not
mentioned at all, and what you call "ansi escape codes" probably refers
to 8 colour terminals, as ansi is based on an 8 colour model (only some
pc terminals use 16 colours, which is very rare). Also, both the 256
colour palette and the 24 bit true colour case as you call them are 24
bit true colour, so it makes no sense distinguishing them on that basis -
the difference is simply the way they select colours, as both modes can
request any 24 bit colour.
Lastly, truecolour doesn't "means that you can display 16 milion
different colours at the same time".
> BTW, this code works as expected (as on the first screenshot) on
> various terminals, not only iTerm2.
It (likely) works as expected on rxvt-unicode as well - what you see is
the effect of a limited number of colours that are available (especially
in the default 88 colour mode), so urxvt has to recycle colours after a
while.
--
The choice of a Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
-----==- _GNU_ http://www.deliantra.net
----==-- _ generation
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [email protected]
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
_______________________________________________
rxvt-unicode mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.schmorp.de/mailman/listinfo/rxvt-unicode
