"T. Alexander Popiel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
:Urg, try two, without the patch (so I don't hit the message size
:limits).  The patch has been made available at:
:  http://www.best.com/~popiel/scrollbar.patch
:
:Hello.  I'm new here, so I don't know if I'm stepping on anybody's
:toes, covering old ground, or anything like that.  If I am, please
:tell me, and I'll desist. :-)

No problems.  I'm very happy to have input of ideas - and the associated
patches :-)

:The last three times I've installed rxvt, I've gotten grumpy, because
:I prefer the athena (aka xterm) scrollbar semantics, instead of the
:normal rxvt semantics.  While this is a simple compile-time option,
:it's a pain to use, since most installs these days are done with
:precompiled binaries.

I have already introduced something similar into the beta series (2.7.*)
around 2.7.5  so that you can compile in 0, 1, 2 or 3 scrollbar styles
and choose them via the "scrollstyle" resource or long option.  Thus
the benefit for precompiled package generators is that he/she can build
with all 3 styles and the end user can choose his/her own preference.

I didn't make it a short option because I presumed that most people would
use one scrollbar style and stick to it, in which case he/she would just
put that style into his/her resource list (one can experiment via long
options since long options and resources are equivalently named). e.g.
% rxvt --scrollstyle next

:There are three new runtime options included in my changes:
:  -ss style   scrollbar style; style = rxvt | xterm / athena | next
:  -sw width   scrollbar width
:  -sa align   scrollbar thumb click alignment; align = center | top | bottom

The "-sa" option is interesting and I think is worth integrating.
Again, I don't know if it's worth putting in as a short option since once
someone has chosen one he/she will usually stick with it.  Maybe someone
can suggest reasons otherwise?

I'm not sure about "-sw" (BTW, "-sw" is currently used for a different
option in 2.7.*).  xterm calls it (for whatever reason) "thickness" so
that's probably the name I'd consider appropriate.

Regards,
-- 
Geoff Wing   gcw
main email :  " @pobox.com
rxvt stuff :  " @rxvt.org
zsh stuff  :  " @zsh.org

Reply via email to