On Sa, 2015-01-24 at 13:39 +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote: > W dniu 24.01.2015 o 12:57, Jens Georg pisze: > > > >> W dniu 30.06.2014 o 19:10, Jens Georg pisze: > >>> > >>> Can you provide a network dump so that we can see what the tv actually > >>> requests? > >> > >> I just re-tested with 0.24.2 and the problem is still there. I have > >> tried using wireshark to get something, but I am not sure how useful it > >> will be as I am absolute wireshark newbie. Please let me know if I can > >> do anything else. Thank you for all the help in advance! > > > > So, Jussi was right. If you go for the "by metadata", the devices does a > > recursive browse and fails to interpret the refId (which indicates that > > this is kind of a symbolic link to another item on the server), hence > > the duplicate (UPnP has a mechanism to say "this is item with id foo > > which is actually a reference to item with id bar") > > Thanks so much for looking into this! Do you think this is something > that could be worked around on rygel side? > > > > > Did you also provide a trace for the normal browse > > > > > > The 2nd file, unsorted.pcapng, should be the normal, per-filename browse > trace. The issue with that one is that the files are in seemingly random > order. This makes looking for particular files and folders difficult: > https://belegdol.fedorapeople.org/rygel/IMG_20150124_133618.jpg > Please let me know if you were referring to something else and I will be > more than happy to provide it.
Sorry, found it. Yeah, same. It asks for sort order +upnp:class,+dc:date We could possibly work around that, but I'm not sure whether the device would like that. _______________________________________________ rygel-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/rygel-list
