On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 11:31:55AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 05:30:14 +0900 > Isaku Yamahata <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This patch is not for merge yet as I haven't tested it yet. > > I'll test this patch the next week. > > > > As vxlan support would come, allow more option type in addition to > > ofp server address. > > This patch is just clean up and n preparation for vxlan. > > > > Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <[email protected]> > > --- > > quantum/plugins/ryu/agent/ryu_quantum_agent.py | 12 +++++----- > > quantum/plugins/ryu/db/api.py | 14 +++++++---- > > quantum/plugins/ryu/db/models.py | 28 > > +++++++++++++---------- > > quantum/plugins/ryu/ryu_quantum_plugin.py | 4 +- > > 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > > Let's not go with this way. We need to move away from Quantum db. We > need to use more scalable data store and we need to think about > supporting other IaaS.
I should have clearly marked this patch for quantum. It's natural for quantum plugin/agent to use quantum db, I think. (I agree with you that Ryu itself should not depend on quantum db.) Or you are saying event quantum plugin/agent should be away from quantum db? -- yamahata ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 _______________________________________________ Ryu-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel
