On Fri, 18 May 2012 10:11:10 +0900 Isaku Yamahata <[email protected]> wrote:
> I chose this inconsistency because the spec is inconsistent. :-( > >>From the spec 1.0, > struct ofp_desc_stats > struct ofp_flow_stats > struct ofp_aggregate_stats_reply > struct ofp_table_stats > struct ofp_port_stats > struct ofp_queue_stats > > Later versions also keep this inconsistency. > Hmm, it seems that they decided to keep it instead of fixing it > with compatibility breakage. > > I vote for going with the spec. I missed that. Ok, the patch is dropped. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Ryu-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel
