On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 03:59:10PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 15:04:42 +0900 > Simon Horman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 02:44:20PM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > > I think that we complete nx_match except for NXM_NX_COOKIE that I've > > > not tested. I might miss something though. > > > > It may be worth considering splitting out adding the header parameter > > to the initialiser of MFField into a separate patch. I think that would > > make the NXM_NX_REG changes more obvious. > > Yeah, you are right. I should have done so. Sorry, I've already merged > it though.
No problem. I am, however, concerned that the last parameter of set_reg_masked() in set_reg() should be UINT32_MAX instead of 0. If so the put method of MFRegister will also need to be updated. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Ryu-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel
