On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 10:49:01AM -0300, Eder Leão Fernandes wrote: > Hi, > > I have a question regarding how masked OXM values are stored in the flow > tables. I would like to know if the values should be stored with the > respective mask applied? > For example: > If I have an IP source value 192.168.16.150 and mask 0xffffff00. The value > should be stored as 192.168.16.150 or 192.168.16.0? > > I'm asking this because, when testing Ryu Controller with CPqD implementation > of OpenFlow 1.2 software switch, I noticed that tests with masked fields > expect > values with the mask
Do you have any request to Ryu side? If so, can you please describe more details? thanks > applied, leading to failures, since the switch implementation doesn't stores > the values with the masks applied. > > Thanks in advance, > Eder. > > -- > > _______________________________________________ > openflow-discuss mailing list > openflow-disc...@lists.stanford.edu > https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/openflow-discuss -- yamahata ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Ryu-devel mailing list Ryu-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel
