On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:44:54 +0900 (JST) [email protected] (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
>>> On Thu, 4 Jul 2013 17:22:36 +0900 >>> YAMAMOTO Takashi <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: YAMAMOTO Takashi <[email protected]> >>>> --- >>>> ryu/ofproto/ofproto_v1_2.py | 91 ++--------------------------------- >>>> ryu/ofproto/ofproto_v1_3.py | 101 ++------------------------------------- >>>> ryu/ofproto/oxm_fields.py | 113 >>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> 3 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 186 deletions(-) >>>> create mode 100644 ryu/ofproto/oxm_fields.py >>> >>> With this, OF1.2 have some like PBB that are not defined in OF1.2 >>> spec? >> >> yes. >> >> YAMAMOTO Takashi > > if you prefer not having the definitions for OF1.2 parser, > we can have oxm_types per OF versions. i'm not sure if it's > worth the effort, though. if one is interested in the spec, > he should look at it, not our definitions. Our definitions had better to match to the spec. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Ryu-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel
