> could you elaborate a little bit more how to make switches report lldp
> speaking neighbors?
> Do I need to change lldp_parse function or something else?

yes, it would be the first step.

YAMAMOTO Takashi

> 
> Thanks
> -Mo
> 
> 
> 
> 2014-04-01 0:39 GMT-05:00 FUJITA Tomonori <[email protected]>:
> 
>> On Tue,  1 Apr 2014 14:01:52 +0900 (JST)
>> [email protected] (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
>>
>> >> On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 17:32:01 -0500
>> >> Dong Mo <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> This works great for getting switch-to-switch addresses and topology.
>> >>>
>> >>> A follow up question is that what about get information about the
>> hosts'
>> >>> MAC address that is attached to the switch?
>> >>>
>> >>> Say host1-s1-s2-host2. Using the lldp, we can get info about s1--s2
>> but not
>> >>> host1-s1.
>> >>>
>> >>> Let's assume s1 is an ovs, is it possible to get attachment info by
>> looking
>> >>> at ovsdb or what is the best practice to do that?
>> >>
>> >> I'm not sure you can get such info from ovsdb. I think that you can do
>> >> by catching the first packet from the host via packet_in.
>> >
>> > probably it's better to make topology.switches accept and report info
>> > from lldp-speaking neighbours.
>>
>> Yeah. Sounds like nice.
>>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Ryu-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel

Reply via email to