Hi, all. I'm trying to make a patch for this.
But I'm not sure which behavior is more preferable? 1. These configuration items will override the output port in the test files. 2. These configuration items will not override the output port in the test files. I think 1. should be more preferable, but I'm not quite about this. Thanks! -PLX On 8/18/14, Minoru TAKAHASHI <[email protected]> wrote: > (2014年08月09日 22:37), FUJITA Tomonori wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, 8 Aug 2014 16:03:36 +0800 >> Pyxis LX <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> We're conducting conformance tests using ryu/tests/switch/terster.py >>> heavily. >> >> Thanks! >> >>> Is it possible to make these parameters configurable? >>> >>> TESTER_SENDER_PORT >>> TESTER_RECEIVE_PORT >>> TARGET_SENDER_PORT >>> TARGET_RECEIVE_PORT >>> >>> This will be more flexible to deal with devices that hashed their >>> openflow port_no. > > Hi, Pyxis > > It’s a great idea.I try to make a patch. > If you already have a patch, let me know. > > thanks > >> >> Sounds a good idea. Do you already have a patch? >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> _______________________________________________ >> Ryu-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Ryu-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel
