Hi,

Now that I solved my other problems I'm trying to try some things
using group tables.

But the weird thing is that it doesn't seem to work.

I tried what you wrote in the previous email:

mininet@mininet-vm:~$ curl -X POST -d '{
>     "dpid": 1,
>     "type": "FF",
>     "group_id": 1,
>     "buckets": [
>         {
>             "watch_port": 1,
>             "actions": [
>                 {
>                     "type": "OUTPUT",
>                     "port": 1
>                 }
>             ]
>         }
>     ]
>  }' http://localhost:8080/stats/groupentry/add
mininet@mininet-vm:~$
mininet@mininet-vm:~$ curl -X GET http://localhost:8080/stats/groupdesc/1
{"1": []}mininet@mininet-vm:~$
mininet@mininet-vm:~$ curl -X POST -d '{
>     "dpid": 1,
>     "match":{
>         "vlan_vid": 5
>     },
>     "actions":[
>         {
>             "type":"GROUP",
>             "group_id": 1
>         }
>     ]
>  }' http://localhost:8080/stats/flowentry/add
mininet@mininet-vm:~$
mininet@mininet-vm:~$ curl -X GET http://localhost:8080/stats/flow/1
{"1": []}

Even though ryu's log show me that the requests got accepted:

mininet@mininet-vm:~/ryu$ PYTHONPATH=~/ryu ~/ryu/bin/ryu-manager
~/ryu/ryu/app/ofctl_rest.py
loading app /home/mininet/ryu/ryu/app/ofctl_rest.py
loading app ryu.controller.ofp_handler
instantiating app None of DPSet
creating context dpset
creating context wsgi
instantiating app /home/mininet/ryu/ryu/app/ofctl_rest.py of RestStatsApi
instantiating app ryu.controller.ofp_handler of OFPHandler
(8305) wsgi starting up on http://0.0.0.0:8080/
(8305) accepted ('127.0.0.1', 54645)
127.0.0.1 - - [09/Jan/2015 17:38:48] "POST /stats/groupentry/add
HTTP/1.1" 200 115 0.010800
(8305) accepted ('127.0.0.1', 54646)
127.0.0.1 - - [09/Jan/2015 17:38:49] "GET /stats/groupdesc/1 HTTP/1.1"
200 131 1.004360
(8305) accepted ('127.0.0.1', 54647)
127.0.0.1 - - [09/Jan/2015 17:38:49] "POST /stats/flowentry/add
HTTP/1.1" 200 115 0.001661
(8305) accepted ('127.0.0.1', 54648)
127.0.0.1 - - [09/Jan/2015 17:38:52] "GET /stats/flow/1 HTTP/1.1" 200
131 0.001752

And the weird thing is that when I try to push another flow entry
(that I used for another example) it's working fine:

mininet@mininet-vm:~$ curl -X POST -d '{
>     "dpid": 1,
>     "cookie": 1,
>     "cookie_mask": 1,
>     "table_id": 0,
>     "idle_timeout": 0,
>     "hard_timeout": 0,
>     "priority": 11111,
>     "flags": 1,
>     "match":{
>         "nw_dst": "11.0.0.2",
>         "eth_type": 2048
>     },
>     "actions":[
>         {
>             "type":"OUTPUT",
>             "port": 2
>         }
>     ]
>  }' http://localhost:8080/stats/flowentry/add
mininet@mininet-vm:~$ curl -X GET http://localhost:8080/stats/flow/1
{"1": [{"actions": ["OUTPUT:2"], "idle_timeout": 0, "cookie": 1,
"packet_count": 0, "hard_timeout": 0, "byte_count": 0, "length": 96,
"duration_nsec": 127000000, "priority": 11111, "duration_sec": 11,
"table_id": 0, "flags": 1, "match": {"dl_type": 2048, "nw_dst":
"11.0.0.2"}}]

Do you have any idea why? I'm running out of ideas why it doesn't work :/.

Thanks for your help.

Best,
Clément

On 2 December 2014 at 01:56, Yusuke Iwase <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2014年12月01日 20:13, Clément Rault wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Ok, thanks.
>>
>>> I think it's right.
>>> OpenFlow Spec describes like as follows.
>>>
>>> -------
>>> OpenFlow1.3.4 Spec:
>>>  5.6.1 Group Types
>>> -------
>>>     ...
>>>   - Optional: fast failover: Execute the first live bucket. Each action 
>>> bucket is associated with
>>>     a specific port and/or group that controls its liveness. The buckets 
>>> are evaluated in the order
>>>     defined by the group, and the first bucket which is associated with a 
>>> live port/group is selected.
>>>     ...
>>> -------
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>
>> I'm wondering what will happen if every bucket is down. Will it simply
>> stop the processing of this and drop it or do you think it will still
>> the examine the other (next) group tables (because what I understood
>> is that the switch will examine every group table one after each
>> other)?
>
> Is your question about the behavior of Group Table specified by OpenFlow?
> If so, please refer to OpenFlow Specification.
> (and see the section "5.6.1 Group Types".)
>
>  https://www.opennetworking.org/sdn-resources/onf-specifications/openflow
>
> If you have still any questions, I guess you have a better chance
> to get an answer on ONF mailing list.
>
>>
>> Best,
>> Clément
>>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
_______________________________________________
Ryu-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel

Reply via email to