BRCM OFDPA can support it although it has limited usage. BigSwitch also has it on oftest code.
I know standard don't specify it has mask on in_port. But I think it doesn't obey standard. Standard just define a framework. If Openflow agent can support it, I think can use it. -----Original Message----- From: Yusuke Iwase [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, September 07, 2015 1:40 PM To: macauley_cheng 鄭振昌 Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Ryu-devel] I add in_port has mask field. Hi, Thank you for your patch, but I think the in_port match field is defined as "No Masked" field in OpenFlow Spec 1.3.4. On my environment, OVS returns OFPErrorMsg with the following error type and code. type: OFPET_BAD_MATCH(4) code: OFPBMC_BAD_MASK(8) Does your switch supports "masked" in_port field? Thanks, Iwase On 2015年09月07日 12:56, Macauley Cheng wrote: > Attach is my added. It pass “run-test.sh”. > > I don’t know how to contribute the code, so I put here. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ryu-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Ryu-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel
