Hi Fujita-San > You mean that after I apply > > [PATCH v2 0/8] Support some NXAction > > then you send a patch to revert > > commit 3c3896fd77f274ce953dcb78795aa5cc4fde6c65 > Author: Shinpei Muraoka <[email protected]> > Date: Mon Jun 6 09:48:12 2016 +0900 > > ofproto/nx_actions: Update arguments to be compatible with ovs-ofctl > > > Do I correctly understand what you mean?
Yes. I want to do just it. > Do I correctly understand what you mean? > > I'm also concerned about the subject of the following patch in the new patchset: > > [PATCH v2 3/8] ofproto/nx_actions: Update arguments to be compatible with ovs-ofctl > > > You try to add start/end as optional arguments and converts to > ofs/nbits to keep the compatibility? Or revert the whole start/end > stuff? I will revert the whole start/end stuff. This patch allows to set the string value(reg0 etc) for src or dst. Does anyone want to aboid this change? If the person you want to avoid is present, Please discard "[PATCH v2 0/8] Support some NXAction". I will make patch based on current master. After that I will remove the "[PATCH v2 3/8] ofproto/nx_actions: Update arguments to be compatible with ovs-ofctl" and release the "[PATCH v3 0/7] Support some NXAction". Thanks, On 2016年07月11日 15:59, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:49:16 +0900 > Shinpei Muraoka <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Fujita-San >> >>> We should have really good reason to break the API compatibility with >>> the older versions. I don't think that this is the case. >>> >>> Seems that better to revert this. Can we cleanly revert this? Any >>> other side effect? >> >> I think it have side effect and it need some patches. >> >> If "[PATCH v2 0/8] Support some NXAction" looks patch good, >> I will make patch for "[PATCH 4/7] ofproto/nx_actions: Update >> arguments to be compatible with ovs-ofctl" >> based on this patch. >> >> If "[PATCH v2 0/8] Support some NXAction" is difficult to marge, >> Please discard this patch. >> I will make patch based on current master. > > You mean that after I apply > > [PATCH v2 0/8] Support some NXAction > > then you send a patch to revert > > commit 3c3896fd77f274ce953dcb78795aa5cc4fde6c65 > Author: Shinpei Muraoka <[email protected]> > Date: Mon Jun 6 09:48:12 2016 +0900 > > ofproto/nx_actions: Update arguments to be compatible with ovs-ofctl > > > Do I correctly understand what you mean? > > I'm also concerned about the subject of the following patch in the new > patchset: > > [PATCH v2 3/8] ofproto/nx_actions: Update arguments to be compatible with > ovs-ofctl > > > You try to add start/end as optional arguments and converts to > ofs/nbits to keep the compatibility? Or revert the whole start/end > stuff? > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Attend Shape: An AT&T Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at AT&T Park in San Francisco, CA to explore cutting-edge tech and listen to tech luminaries present their vision of the future. This family event has something for everyone, including kids. Get more information and register today. http://sdm.link/attshape _______________________________________________ Ryu-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel
