Hi Juan,

The concept for the IP address wildcarding is the same with that of OpenFlow 
protocol matching.

To match against "10.1.1.0/24" network, *mostly* you need to set 
nw_dest/nw_src="10.1.1.0/24".
But please note this rule also matches the packet sent to "10.1.1.1/28", 
because the high-order
24 bits "10.1.1.*" are the same.

If strictly matching is required, you need to sniffer or detect the context of 
the IP network
negotiation (ARP, ICPMv6,...etc), I guess. I don't think it practical though...


Thanks,
Iwase


On 2017年03月02日 16:30, Juan Francisco Guano wrote:
> Ok, I try... summarizing I wanna know what Is the correct way to set a rule 
> in a whole network: the IP address of network AND with only netmask 32 for 
> example 10.0.1.0/32 <http://10.0.1.0/32> or the IP address of network with 
> another mask for example 10.0.1.0/25 <http://10.0.1.0/25>? In this case apply 
> the same concept  of wildcarding off of protocol??
> 
> Regards 
> 
> Juan
> 
> El 2 mar. 2017 1:38 AM, "Iwase Yusuke" <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> escribió:
> 
>     Hi Juan,
> 
>     Well... rest_firewall is just a sample application for the Ryu-Book, it 
> is supposed to be calculated
>     manually by users, I guess...
> 
>     For just applying IP network mask, you can use "netaddr" though.
>     >>> import netaddr
>     >>> str(netaddr.IPNetwork("192.168.0.1/24 
> <http://192.168.0.1/24>").network)
>     '192.168.0.0'
> 
> 
>     Thanks,
>     Iwase
> 
>     On 2017年03月02日 15:25, Juan Francisco Guano wrote:
>     > Hi Iwase, thank you so much... Another question Do you know any 
> resource of a wildcard calculator that could works With the rest firewall?, 
> for example for define a range of IP address in a network to accept o deny 
> traffic?
>     >
>     > Regards
>     >
>     > Juab
>     >
>     > El 2 mar. 2017 12:35 AM, "Iwase Yusuke" <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>> escribió:
>     >
>     >     Hi Juan,
>     >
>     >     Sorry, I misunderstood.
>     >
>     >     I guess, it comes from the constraint of OpenFlow Matching rule.
>     >     If you specify nw_dst="10.0.0.1/24 <http://10.0.0.1/24> 
> <http://10.0.0.1/24>", this means:
>     >       "The high-order 24 bits are used for IP address matching and 
> other is wildcarded"
>     >     and does NOT mean:
>     >       "Matching to the destination 10.0.0.1 address in the 10.0.0.0/24 
> <http://10.0.0.0/24> <http://10.0.0.0/24> network"
>     >     These are very similar, but strictly speaking these does not have 
> the same meaning.
>     >     Please refer to "7.2.3.4 Flow Matching" in OpenFlow Spec 1.3 for 
> details.
>     >
>     >     e.g.)
>     >     With nw_dst="10.0.0.1/24 <http://10.0.0.1/24> 
> <http://10.0.0.1/24>", this rule will be translated to "10.0.0.*" (* means 
> wildcarded).
>     >       packets to 10.0.0.2 <http://10.0.0.2>:  MATCH
>     >       packets to 10.1.0.1 <http://10.1.0.1>:  NOT MATCH
>     >
>     >     If you want to distinguish the packets only which have "10.0.0.1" 
> in "10.0.0.0/24 <http://10.0.0.0/24> <http://10.0.0.0/24>" network
>     >     as the destination, you need to set nw_dst="10.0.0.1/32 
> <http://10.0.0.1/32> <http://10.0.0.1/32>" in OpenFlow match field.
>     >     32 means the exact match for "10.0.0.1" address.
>     >
>     >     Thanks,
>     >     Iwase
>     >
>     >     On 2017年03月01日 20:32, Juan Francisco Guano wrote:
>     >     > Hi Iwase, thank you so much by your reply... I know that 
> 255.000.000.00 Is same "8" for format. Now if you check my original question 
> , you can appreciate that I así for an specific  IP address "10.0.0.2/8 
> <http://10.0.0.2/8> <http://10.0.0.2/8> <http://10.0.0.2/8> " why Is  the 
> same in flow that "10.0.0.3/8 <http://10.0.0.3/8> <http://10.0.0.3/8> 
> <http://10.0.0.3/8>" rule in a switch(I  check this with dump-flows command 
> and I get 10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0 <http://10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0> 
> <http://10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0> <http://10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0> in  both case )? How 
> the controller/switch distinguish this flows? Why the flows are  replace it 
> in the switch? Why with a netmask 32 the flows/rules are different? Is it 
> possible  that this case Is linked with wildcarding function un the app?
>     >     >
>     >     > Any help Is welcome...
>     >     >
>     >     > Regards
>     >     >
>     >     > Juan
>     >     >
>     >     > El 1 mar. 2017 2:58 AM, "Iwase Yusuke" <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> <mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>>> escribió:
>     >     >
>     >     >     Hi Juan,
>     >     >
>     >     >     First, "255.0.0.0" in "10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0 
> <http://10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0> <http://10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0> 
> <http://10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0>" means the subnet mask and has the same meaning 
> with "8".
>     >     >     "8" is just formatted in the prefix representation.
>     >     >
>     >     >     And, when your get without the mask, like "10.0.0.0", the 
> subnet mask "255.255.255.0"(="32" in
>     >     >     the prefix representation) is just omitted for the 
> readability.
>     >     >     So, you can set the netmask other than 32.
>     >     >
>     >     >     Thanks,
>     >     >     Iwase
>     >     >
>     >     >     On 2017年03月01日 15:54, Juan Francisco Guano wrote:
>     >     >     > Hi everybody
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     > I know, if this value is correct when I set a rule in a 
> REST FIREWALL, this directly linked with the netmask, if I set a rule for the 
> IP Address and your netmask ;10.0.0.2/8 <http://10.0.0.2/8> 
> <http://10.0.0.2/8> <http://10.0.0.2/8> <http://10.0.0.2/8>, when I get the 
> rules the IP address is the below; .... "nw_dst": "10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0 
> <http://10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0> <http://10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0> 
> <http://10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0> <http://10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0>".... what is the 
> meaning of that? I cant set any rule with a different netmask of 32? for 
> example I set the rule for  the IP Address and your netmask ;10.0.0.1/32 
> <http://10.0.0.1/32> <http://10.0.0.1/32> <http://10.0.0.1/32> 
> <http://10.0.0.1/32> and I get a rule without any mask;.... "nw_dst": 
> "10.0.0.1"....
>     >     >     > Please any explanation is welcome..
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     > Regards
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     > Juan
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     > 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >     >     > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's 
> most
>     >     >     > engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     >
>     >     >     > _______________________________________________
>     >     >     > Ryu-devel mailing list
>     >     >     > [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]> 
> <mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> 
> <mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]> 
> <mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>>
>     >     >     > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel 
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel> 
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel 
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel>> 
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel 
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel> 
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel 
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel>>>
>     >     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     > 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     >     > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>     >     > engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     > _______________________________________________
>     >     > Ryu-devel mailing list
>     >     > [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]> 
> <mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     >     > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel 
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel> 
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel 
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel>>
>     >     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>     > engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > Ryu-devel mailing list
>     > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel 
> <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel>
>     >
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ryu-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Ryu-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel

Reply via email to