Hi Jerico,
Thank you for your report!
Adding "eth_src=src" in the match looks good to me, but please confirm your
situation.
You mean this issue will occur, when we do the following?
- Connect to the first switch and learn the connected hosts
- Connect to the second switch and try to learn the new hosts
---> the second switch cannot learn the connected hosts which the first switch
already know
I asked this question because I couldn't reproduce your situation on my
environment (Mininet).
Thanks,
Iwase
On 2017年11月24日 00:19, Jerico Moeyersons wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm kinda new to bug reporting, so I found this e-mail address. If I need to do it elsewhere, please
notify me of that!
The reason why I mail you is because I found a 'bug' (or maybe it is the purpose of the example) in
the example switch. Here, a flow is added with as match the destination and the in_port. But when
you combine two switches (I use the small Zodiac FX switch), this will have the issue that when you
want to add a second flow to something on the second switch, no new flow is added (because the
destination is know, ...).
So my suggestion: add the eth_src=src in the match entry before adding the flow (this solved the
issue for me).
Can you please provide feedback?
Thanks in advance!
Kind regards,
Jerico Moeyersons
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Ryu-devel mailing list
Ryu-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Ryu-devel mailing list
Ryu-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel
