Iwamoto, Thanks. Does the Ryu team do any bakeoff type work with OpenFlow hardware vendors ? Has any been done with Netgear?
Do you know why there is a differen e between the simple_switch_13.py that comes in the python3-ryu package and that which Maen pointed to on the git repository? Regards, Diarmuid On Mon 18 Feb 2019, 04:54 IWAMOTO Toshihiro <iwam...@valinux.co.jp wrote: > I checked your PDF document. > Packet counts of the table-miss flow entry is strange in the hardware > switch setup. Maybe the controller isn't getting expected packet-ins, > which can be the reason why the forwarding flow entries aren't > populated. > I have no idea if this is due to hardware problems or configuration > issuese. > > > On Sun, 17 Feb 2019 02:56:35 +0900, > Diarmuid O Briain wrote: > > > > [1 <multipart/alternative (7bit)>] > > [1.1 <text/plain; UTF-8 (7bit)>] > > Maen, > > > > Interesting, I compared the *simple_switch13.py* file you linked me to > and > > the one that comes with the *python3-ryu* package (installed with apt-get > > install python3-ryu). > > > > $ *diff /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/ryu/app/simple_switch_13.py > > maen_version_simple_switch_13.py* > > 105c105 > > < match = parser.OFPMatch(in_port=in_port, eth_dst=dst) > > --- > > > match = parser.OFPMatch(in_port=in_port, eth_dst=dst, > > eth_src=src) > > 120d119 > > < > > > > That would seem to bear out what you say. I am a little lost as to what > > that means though. Why the difference? > > The diff is due to the following commit, but I don't think it matters > in your case. > > commit 3b946c01929c6f390721731c9d31aa09feeb858a > Author: Jerico Moeyersons <jeric...@hotmail.com> > Date: Tue Nov 28 10:28:12 2017 +0900 > > app: Fix simple_switch for multi switch env > > > > regards, > > > > Diarmuid > > -- > > > > *Irish by birth, located in Uganda but Munster by the grace of God.* > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 at 19:04, Maen Artimy <arti...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Diarmuid, > > > There is something odd about the application you are running. The > > > simple_switch_13.py should match three fields not two. Also it should > not > > > output the packet to the same input port (see line 105) . So I would > start > > > by checking if the application is correct. > > > https://github.com/osrg/ryu/blob/master/ryu/app/simple_switch_13.py > > > > > > Regards, > > > Maen > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 11:36 AM Diarmuid O Briain < > diarm...@obriain.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> I have spent ages playing with Ryu and mininet and decided to try some > > >> actual physical switches. I compared using Ryu with an OvS switching > for > > >> physical ports in a server with Ryu controlling a Netgear M4300-48G in > > >> OpenFlow v1.3 mode. The response in both cases were different and I > > >> documented it in the attached. I would appreciate it if someone who > knows > > >> more about the Ryu controller than me would look and try explain the > > >> different outcomes from scenarios on A and B. > > >> > > >> much appreciated. > > >> > > >> Diarmuid O'Briain > > >> -- > > -- > IWAMOTO Toshihiro >
_______________________________________________ Ryu-devel mailing list Ryu-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel
