On 2019-02-23 6:33 a.m., Ahmed Al-Utaibi wrote:
even if i make the hard time out very small, there is no grantee that
the flow will be matching thousands of packets.
Maybe look at it the other way around: use a low precedence flow entry
to punt packets to your application. Your application then installs a
higher priority more specific flow entry to bypass the default.
Probably more deterministic that way.
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 1:01 AM Artem Gromov <artyomgro...@gmail.com
<mailto:artyomgro...@gmail.com>> wrote:
you can use flow entries with hard_timeout.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019, 16:06 Ahmed Al-Utaibi <ahmed...@gmail.com
<mailto:ahmed...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello everyone
I am looking for a way to match with a flow but instead of
sending all matched packets of the flow to the controller, the
switch only sends one packet (the first to match, maybe the
first in a fixed time period). After that the table entry can
be removed (or the fixed time can be reset).
Raymond
https://blog.raymond.burkholder.net
_______________________________________________
Ryu-devel mailing list
Ryu-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ryu-devel
