Hello again Martin,
Martin Neitzel <[email protected]> wrote:
|Steffen's recent mentioning of his target "re`work the addressing scheme"
not really reworking, i only want to overhaul all the stuff and
make the thread display and especially thread selection รก la
"&PARENT" work. All to often i say something like "copy &x +Y"
and i don't get the complete thread, and threads that are grouped
together in say mutt(1) are placed in subgroups.. Etc. Say, in
the Re: detection we should MIME decode and take no care for
whitespace nits, as has shown by Bob Tennent a while ago.
|reminded me of something I often miss in nail/s-nail/mailxen \
|in current BSDs.
|
|All too often, I am too quick to delete some message and a bit later I
|need to resurrect it using the "u[ndelete]" command. Fine, when u- does
|the job or its number is still visible but if not, it is not easy to
|identify the missing message:
|
| & f :d
| No applicable messages.
|
|Understandable, but it would be Oh So Great![*] if "from" (perhaps even
|others) would provide a bit leeway when :d is explicitly requested.
Yes, this troubles me too, it is yet stated in TODO:
. The :d modifier is extremely useless even though POSIX compliant (No
deleted message or deleted message header shall be displayed by any
mailx command other than undelete.)
If i say p:d or f:d it should work.
--steffen
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
_______________________________________________
S-nail-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/s-nail-users
