Hello.

Ralph Corderoy <[email protected]> wrote:
 |> Interesting: You are right in that the standard explicitly requires
 |> the From_ line to be written.
 |
 |I found http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/7908799/xcu/mail.html that
 |says dead.letter is trampled every time, but nothing about the format.
 |And http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/mailx.html
 |that again says it's trampled, but it's mbox format.

First: sorry, i was a bit tired on Saturday/Sunday.

Had yet changed before going online to fix *debug* handling which
was yet wrong anyway, but should have looked.  Will fix.

 |> I have rewritten it!, and now we at least produce the From_ line which
 |> makes this an MBOX.  It is still not compliant because we don't
 |> produce any header lines, maybe i can do something about that before
 |> v14.9 and will fix it up, but i can't promise that.
 |
 |Don't forget the From-munging;  I couldn't find a recent relevant change
 |on https://git.sdaoden.eu/cgit/s-nail.git/log/?h=crawl when I looked.

Seems cgit caches this page for some time, should be five minutes,
then.  Hmm.  Nothing else to be done for it.
And yes, it is really bad, i see now.  Maybe it will be possible
to do some more about it and use the usual mechanism for sending
a bit, or so, to get something really valid.  I will have a look
this evening.

 |(http://qmail.org./man/man5/mbox.html is a good overview of the mbox
 |formats.)

Oh, please!  I have removed all MBOXO/MBOXRD code from the
codebase!  We go for RFC 4155 and have a more intelligent MIME
encoder that does-the-right thing as necessary.  I really don't
want to reintroduce that rude stuff for $DEAD again.
Ciao,

--steffen

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
__________________________________
[email protected]

Reply via email to