Quoth Steffen Nurpmeso: ' please use the real list address so
that people can use a simple address check. Please.'
I addressed the last message (and this one) thusly:
to: [email protected]
is that incorrect? Oddly /var/log/maillog records:
Dec 11 11:25:59 randytool sm-mta[21172]: wBBIPq8X021172:
to=<[email protected]>, delay=00:00:06, xdelay=00:00:06, mailer=relay,
pri=30855, relay=smtp.gmail.com [173.194.223.108], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (OK
1544552759 m129sm7052317oif.50 - gsmtp)
Dec 11 11:25:59 randytool sendmail[21171]: wBBIPm91021171:
[email protected], [email protected] (0/0),
delay=00:00:11, xdelay=00:00:09, mailer=relay, pri=30614, relay=[127.0.0.1]
[127.0.0.1], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (wBBIPq8X021172 Message accepted for delivery)
but there's no mention of [email protected] in my original message.
Do you understand this? I run my own sendmail; has it cached an
address? I think sdaoden.eu's SMTP server is doing this.
Quoth Steffen Nurpmeso: ' Unless i am totally mistaken you,
Mr. Bell, have found a bug'
I don't understand you. I concluded that I had found a bug in
my sent-mail archiving system, a non-bug in s-mailx. The POSIX man
page to which Mr Corderoy pointed us space-pads day-of-month.
Quoth Steffen Nurpmeso: 'In the end, who am i?'
It doesn't matter who you are in the end - I'm addressing you
now. I've made small contributions to the code base and appreciate
the people doing the real work. I'll honor your wishes, of course,
because you're so honorable.
russell bell
