> I have noticed that most
> of the P:64 guys run short trains and do not back them up much.  If
> you like to run long trains (over 25 cars) and want to back up for
> switching moves, then P:64 should be considered carefully before
> taking the plunge since the end results might not be to your liking.
> I believe the intent with P:64 is to use the exact prototype
> dimensions divided by 64, which is theoretically perfect for S
> scale.  Except that weight is not divided by 64 and so staying on the
> track becomes more problematic.

Sorry to change the direction of this, but... with the above in mind, let me
ask this (stupid question)... and I ask this because I am strongly
considering going P:64...


Theoretically thinking, wouldn't increasing the weight of cars, even to an
excessive amount, enable longer trains to be operated more reliably, even
through forward or backing switching operations, without fear of derailment?

Now, I do realise that increasing the weight of the cars would, in and of
itself, be a factor that would also shorten trains, based on the ability of
the loco(s) to pull the extra weight.  But then again, we must consider the
fact that most switching operation are usually done (in yards) with small
numbers of cars in the first place, and on spur tracks by more than one
powered loco (2 or more powered loco being more capable of handling the
increased weight).  So considering those factors, increasing the weight of
cars shouldn't make much of a difference in my view... would it?


John Degnan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From Railroading To Religion... John's World on the Web :
http://www.trainweb.org/seaboard/welcome.htm



Change your membership, change your message settings, use our CALENDAR, view 
shared files or photos, view the list archives, GO TO  
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to