On Wednesday, January 12, 2005, at 12:38 PM, Richard Karnes wrote:
> > Roy et al -- > > The neat thing about bridges is that they are scale-less. The reason > is that the depth of the span for a given loading is proportional to > the length of the span. So, for example, an 87-foot HO bridge can > be used as a 64-foot S scale bridge without sacrificing any realism. > Your only headache would be the width of the deck, to accommodate the > required number of tracks. An HO bridge in S scale can only about 2/3 of what it can carry in HO. An O scale bridge can carry 1/3 more in S scale. Size of the beams make the call on what it can carry. Thank you Larry Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED] I started out with nothing, and I still have most of it. The poll results are in....... To REPLY to the list, use REPLY ALL, to reply to the sender, use REPLY. I do NOT know if this works on all e-mail software, but it works on some of the most common ones. Change your membership, change your message settings, use our CALENDAR, view shared files or photos, view the list archives, GO TO http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
