John, Don, and friends,
     A couple of years ago I ragged on AM for an entirely different 
reason--the backward (or is it upside down) floor on his boxcar/reefer. 
 If you build the car as per instructions the brake appliances all face 
the wrong way.  I had several people 'flame' me, some stating that 
Atheran had done there floor backward also and that I shouldn't pick on 
AM.   Of course, we know that Ron B has copied much of what Atheran has 
done, so the mistakes are copied too.   My problem is that after selling 
thousands of boxcars (and hence paid for the tooling!), couldn't the 
floor be redesigned to correct the mistake?  I didn't mind adding the 
grabs and some of the other detail items, but matching the paint got to 
be a chore.  So if one rebuilds the underbody, adds the grabs, match the 
paint you can have a nice looking car, although the car is somewhat 
short in height.   I stopped building after 6-8 cars and the Pacific 
Rail cars started coming.  Not too long after that SHS line of three 
boxcars helped to make interesting trains.  Now I need to complete my 
Kaslo PS-1, Standard Railway's conversion and a Fowler boxcar that is 
coming--wow who would have thunk it!  all those cars!

Bob Werre

John Picur wrote:

>With all due respect, there is far worse than this that has been produced in 
>S Scale in the past five years.  For example, when will American Models 
>discover that freight cars require certain safety devices, such as 
>grabirons?  End lettering would be nice, too.  And don't get me started on 
>their passenger cars -- such heart-warming gaffs as vestibules in the 
>baggage sections of combines.  That is sheer lunacy.  Their level of "scale 
>fidelity" was obsolete by the end of the 1970s.
>
>Sorry to pick on AM -- I am disappointed with them because they actually 
>have several items I would gladly buy if they would redesign them to 
>scale -- because all of the so-called scale manufacturers have made 
>unsightly errors in some of their products.  ... pqr
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>
>  
>
>>The most glaring example of callous disregard for prototypical appearance 
>>of
>>"scale" models in my memory is Athern's EMD truck sideframes ...
>>
>>Fred T. 
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>
>To REPLY to the list, use REPLY ALL; to reply to the sender, use REPLY.  For 
>those of you on DIGEST mode, all REPLY messages go to the list (remember to 
>edit the SUBJECT of your message).
>
>To use our CALENDAR or LINKS, change message settings, view shared files or 
>photos, view the list archives, GO TO  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/
> 
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>  
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



To REPLY to the list, use REPLY ALL; to reply to the sender, use REPLY.  For 
those of you on DIGEST mode, all REPLY messages go to the list (remember to 
edit the SUBJECT of your message).

To use our CALENDAR or LINKS, change message settings, view shared files or 
photos, view the list archives, GO TO  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to